Skip to main content

Back to the note

Sources — Global Fund OIG research

Every quantitative or status claim in The award was signed. The proof was not ready. maps to a primary OIG locator below. Primaries read 22 Sep 2026 (Africa/Cairo).


Primary PDFs

IDTitle (short)DateTypeURL
GF-OIG-25-005Global Fund Grants to the Togolese Republic4 Jun 2025Audithttps://www.theglobalfund.org/media/gbqltprg/oig_gf-oig-25-005_report_en.pdf
GF-OIG-26-008Ghana — Fraudulent Practice in Proposing for Consultancy Services15 Jun 2026Investigationhttps://www.theglobalfund.org/media/r22gmylm/oig_gf-oig-26-008_report_en.pdf
GF-OIG-23-022Global Fund Grants in Zambia (granular chlorine)20 Dec 2023Investigationhttps://www.theglobalfund.org/media/drtkbofz/oig_gf-oig-23-022_report_en.pdf
GF-OIG-26-006Fraudulent Practices in the Sale of Rapid Diagnostic Tests9 Jun 2026Investigationhttps://www.theglobalfund.org/media/ehkfvxio/oig_gf-oig-26-006_report_en.pdf

Index: https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/oig/reports/

GF-OIG-26-013 (Secretariat indirect procurement) was screened and not used as a fourth case; weaker award-file narrative fit.


Claim → locator table

Framing / method (not OIG facts)

ClaimLocator
Public OIG only; not Trace-li clients; no “would have prevented”Note method — labelled as such
Cost-of-proof voice; a cheap unfinished tool vs finished-work frameTrace-li Research Desk framing — labelled as such
Product wireframes illustrativeCaptions in the note; illustrative product UI

Togo — GF-OIG-25-005

Claim IDStatementLocatorQualification
T-01Report GF-OIG-25-005; audit of GF grants in Togo; 4 Jun 2025PDF cover / headerDistinct from GF-OIG-26-004
T-02PR = Office of the Prime Minister (HIV, TB, malaria)Background / portfolio section—
T-03Procurement & financial management controls: Partially EffectiveExec. Summary / rating table (~pp. on “Partially Effective”)Audit opinion
T-04Non-health €2.4m (GC5) → €7.9m (GC6), excl. C19RM§4.4 p. 18; fn 60—
T-05Additional estimated €29m C19RM non-health budgeted in GC6§4.4 p. 18; fn 61Estimated / budgeted
T-06GC7 projected €5.4m (~5% of grants’ budget)§4.4 p. 18; fn 62Projection
T-07OIG reviewed 30 contracts = 64% of non-health value 2021–2023§4.4 p. 18; fn 63Sample
T-08Of €10m reviewed, incomplete files for €2.7m§4.4 p. 19Incomplete ≠ diversion
T-093 contracts restricted negotiation or single source despite rules; GF non-objection§4.4 p. 19Non-objection ≠ clean bill
T-10Extensions: 30% up to 18 months; authorisation/documentation gaps§4.4 p. 19—
T-11CT scanners contract €2m (2023); unfulfilled as of Oct 2024§4.4 p. 18Status as of Oct 2024 per OIG
T-12AMA 3: assess PMU procurement capacity; due 30 Jun 2026AMA 3 (~p. 20)Agreed ≠ implemented
T-13Delayed DHIS2 phones / LLIN devices examples§4.4 p. 18Programmatic examples
T-14~49% GC6 funds on health products via PPM§4.4 p. 18Framing in finding
—Funds diverted from €2.7m incomplete subset—NOT SUPPORTED — do not claim

Ghana — GF-OIG-26-008

Claim IDStatementLocatorQualification
G-01Investigation of services contract valued at US$831,440§1.1 Investigation at a glance (p. 4)—
G-02Fraudulent practices in proposing / negotiations re labour-cost components§1.1; §2.1Code of Conduct (2021); administrative
G-03Single-sourced DPMU; initial US$361,364 effective 5 Oct 2021; raised to US$831,440§1.2 Genesis and scope—
G-04Impact ≈ US$240,208 on contract value§1.5 Impact; §2.1 title/body (p. 7)OIG estimate
G-05No national-law determination§1.1 / Annex B methodology languageInvestigation ≠ criminal
G-06Secretariat AMA via Sanctions Panel Procedures; Procurement Manual AMA§3 Global Fund Response (pp. 12–13)Marked Implemented in table

Zambia — GF-OIG-23-022

Claim IDStatementLocatorQualification
Z-01Collusion on granular chlorine for COVID preparedness§1.1 (p. 3)—
Z-02Three local suppliers; steered to Supplier 1 with PR-employee links§1.1—
Z-03Contract US$78,030 non-compliant§1.1; Impact sectionFull contract non-compliant
Z-04Overpay US$33,092 potentially recoverable§1.1; Impact (recommends recovery)Potentially recoverable ≠ recovered
Z-05Goods delivered; scheme narrowImpact narrative—
Z-06AMA to recover + actions on individuals/suppliers; LFA >US$50k; ZAMMSA shiftImpact / mitigating measuresAMA agreed ≠ completed
Z-07Grant reference ZMB-C-MOH§1.1—

RDT sales — GF-OIG-26-006

Claim IDStatementLocatorQualification
R-01Fraudulent practices in sale of HIV/malaria RDTs (direct or via PSA)§1.1 (pp. 4–5)Preponderance / more likely than not
R-02Stopped sourcing uncut sheets from WHO-stated manufacturer; no required notification§1.1—
R-0328 countries; 34.4m RDTs; approx. US$12.3m§1.2 / page 5 text + fn 9Approximate value
R-04~89% (30.8m) could not have contained WHO-stated stripsImpact §1.4 (p. 6–7)OIG calculation
R-05~US$11m approx. value of potentially non-compliant RDTs (7.1m HIV + 23.7m malaria est.)§2.1 (≈p. on “approximately US$11 million”)Approximate; scale illustration
R-06~3.4% of ~1bn GF-funded HIV/malaria RDTs in period§1.4Context
R-07No efficacy / adverse-outcome findings§1.1; §1.2Hard qualification
R-08Non-compliance with OIG information/access requestsFinding 2 / §2.2—
R-09Secretariat AMA via Sanctions Panel Procedures§1.4 Impact; §3 Response—

Cross-pack / charts

ChartData usedSources
charts/01-togo-nonhealth-volume.png€2.4 / €7.9 / est. €29 / €5.4T-04, T-05, T-06
charts/02-togo-incomplete-files.png€2.7 of €10T-08
charts/03-cross-case-money.png€2.7m; ~US$240k; US$33k; ~US$11mT-08, G-04, Z-04, R-05
charts/04-pattern-matrix.pngQualitative synthesisAll four primaries — labelled synthesis
charts/05-ghana-contract-impact.pngUS$831,440 / ~US$240,208G-01, G-04
charts/06-value-chain-map.pngStages Intake→Freeze + gap-type synthesisAll four primaries — labelled synthesis; product path illustrative

Dropped / not used

ItemReason
GF-OIG-24-014 CameroonPrefer inventory-heavy; weaker award-file fit vs RDT
GF-OIG-26-013 Indirect ProcurementSecretariat process audit; 21%/49% sample stats are useful but not a country award-file story; retained PDF only
GF-OIG-26-004Explicitly out of scope for Togo pack; do not merge with 25-005
Any “Trace prevented X” counterfactualHard pack rule
Recovery-as-completed languageReports say recommended / potentially recoverable / AMA
RDT efficacy or patient-harm claimsExplicitly not supported by OIG