Audit finding
Incomplete files weakened auditability
UN OIOS found that bid evaluations at UNMISS were not timely and their documentation was inadequate.
UN OIOS · Report 2024/064Award assurance for donor-funded procurement
Traceli connects the rules, evidence and human decisions behind one procurement file—so you can see what’s missing and prepare for review.
Start with one completed procurement file, the question it needs to answer, and your review date. We agree a bounded six-week paid pilot. Your existing process remains authoritative, and no sensitive files move before the data route is agreed.
Illustrative film. Tender and supplier data are fictional.
Built by the people from
Individual prior experience—not customers, partners or endorsements.

Featured research · Before You Sign
Four official records and seven questions for one completed award. Explore the visual briefing and the evidence behind it.
Explore the seven-slide briefing

Public award-assurance cases
Public institutional records show the pattern: weak decision evidence can become an audit finding, ineligible spend, a condition on future funding or an integrity sanction.
Read the evidence and methodologyAudit finding
UN OIOS found that bid evaluations at UNMISS were not timely and their documentation was inadequate.
UN OIOS · Report 2024/064€7.5m
OLAF found an EU agency tender irregular after failures in transparency, equal treatment and proper competition.
European Anti-Fraud Office · 2025€112m
After uncovering rigged competition and fake offers, OLAF recommended protecting future IPARD funding until remedial measures were in place.
European Anti-Fraud Office · 202363 months
The World Bank debarred a supplier that falsely claimed past experience in bids for two financed projects.
World Bank Group · 2025These are public records from the issuing institutions—not Traceli customers, endorsements or claims that Traceli would have prevented the outcomes. They illustrate the consequence categories the assurance model is designed to address.
How Traceli supports your award process
Keep the systems that run procurement. Add one assurance path that shows what governed the decision, which evidence was accepted, where human judgment was applied and whether the required approval is present.
Connect donor, institutional and local rules to the criteria, evidence and approvals that govern the award.
See the assurance workflowKeep supplier proof, reviewer judgment, clarifications and exceptions visible for human disposition before the decision is signed.
See the assurance workflowGive reviewers one source-linked record of the rules, evidence, human decisions, exceptions and approvals.
See the assurance workflowFAQ
The first pilot is deliberately bounded. These answers clarify where Traceli fits, what remains human-owned and what must be agreed before work begins.
No. Those systems remain authoritative for the procedures and transactions they record. Traceli connects the rule, evidence, judgment, exception and approval needed to defend the award across those sources.
No. Traceli surfaces configured controls and supporting evidence for human review. Your authorized people remain responsible for the decision and any compliance determination.
No. It helps the operating team maintain a testable award record before audit and gives independent reviewers a source-linked pack to inspect.
No sensitive file enters the pilot until the NDA, data classification, approved transfer route, processing terms and technical security gate are agreed.
One organization, one completed tender and one six-week retrospective. We reconstruct the rules-to-award evidence chain, expose unresolved proof and test the resulting pack with an independent reviewer.
There is no assumed software budget line. The customer identifies and approves the permitted route, which may sit with programme assurance, audit remediation, internal controls, procurement improvement, fiduciary strengthening or technical assistance.
Documentation
See how Traceli defines award readiness, assembles the assurance pack, handles sensitive evidence and keeps humans accountable—with availability labelled honestly.
Founding paid pilot
In a six-week retrospective, reconstruct the rules-to-award evidence chain, expose missing proof and test whether an independent reviewer can defend the decision.
No sensitive document enters Traceli until the NDA, data classification, approved transfer route and security gate are agreed.